\n

The 2023 presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Prince Adewole Adebayo, has accused the President Bola Tinubu-led government of worsening Nigeria\u2019s economic woes.<\/p>\n

Adebayo likened the government\u2019s policies, including the removal of petrol subsidies and the floatation of the naira, to squeezing Nigerians \u201clike oranges,\u201d leaving them to bear the brunt of escalating hardship across the nation.<\/p>\n

In this interview with the DAILY POST, he shared his alternative ideas that would have made life better and easier for Nigerians instead of the petrol subsidy removal and floating of the Naira by the current administration, which have brought untold hardship to Nigerians and brought the economy to its knees with the Naira falling to its lowest ebb in the international money market.<\/p>\n

He spoke on a wide range of other issues, including the politics of oil refineries in Nigeria and the issue of tax incentives, among others.<\/p>\n

Nigerians are currently going through hard times as a result of the poor economy; are people like you also affected by the harsh economy?<\/strong><\/p>\n

As leaders, whatever our people are going through, we are also going through it. The pain began to affect me even before the election because I already saw what was coming. So, it\u2019s a case of a doctor who can see that the patient has cancer even though the patient is not aware.<\/p>\n

Are you saying you saw this coming?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Not only did I see it coming, I also said that it was coming, and I said it everywhere. Nigeria has only one problem. All the problems they are telling you about Nigeria are just symptoms of one problem and that is bad governance. Like Mrs Oluremi Tinubu said, her husband is not the cause of the problem; he is only the symptom of the problem.<\/p>\n

Talking about alternatives, the three major candidates of the APC, the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, and the Labour Party, LP, during the 2023 electioneering campaigns, all promised they would remove subsidy and float the currency. You didn\u2019t go that route in your campaign, instead, you presented other alternatives. How do you think your alternatives would have had positive impacts on the economy if you had won the election?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The first thing to do in an economy is to realise that there is a lot of wealth trapped in the talent and energy of the people such that the first thing you need to do is to target the reduction of unemployment. The reason monetary economics is allowed is because the fundamental objective of monetary economics is to achieve good employment, not only of labour but also on all factors of production, so that you have allocative efficiencies that clearly want to make you want to invest your money in the economy and get people employed.<\/p>\n

There are five areas you can look into. Agriculture is number one because it employs the highest number of people. It is also a low hanging fruit because it is easy to start. Anybody with a tractor and bucket can get started. It is scalable, so you cannot go into producing raw materials and other things that are additives. It will also make sure you govern your territory such that you are now in full control of your land, where a large portion of it are being shared with bandits since some of them are not in the control by the government. With agriculture, you will create employment and solve the problems of food as well. If you look at the incidence of food prices in the entire aggregation of inflation, it will come down.<\/p>\n

Also, you have to invest in infrastructure. Investing in infrastructure means that you don\u2019t allow people to do for themselves as individuals, things that we can all do collectively. That means you want to make sure that people travelling from one end of the country to the other don\u2019t have to travel in their own vehicles because you have public transport. You need to give people good health. You need to build rural health facilities, as this will employ people and even keep people healthy and more productive. You need to make social investment in education. Many of the cases of unemployment which we are dealing with in our time will be rapidly dealt with, recruiting teachers. But the problems of the governors, even with all the money they are making now is that they don\u2019t want to employ people because when they employ, there is less discretionary spending. This is because if you employ, you must pay as you are bound by contract. Some states, rather than increase compensation for their staff, tell their staff to come to work twice a week.<\/p>\n

If you had won, you would not have removed subsidy on petrol and you would also not have floated the currency. What would you have done differently?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Look at the costing. I am taking their numbers so that they won\u2019t say I\u2019m second-guessing. When the noise first came out, it was under former President Goodluck Jonathan. At that time, it was travelling towards N1 trillion. At a time, it was over N1 trillion. When President Muhammadu Buhari came, it travelled all the way to N4 trillion in the budget, but there was some transparency in the lies such that you had to budget it in the books; it was there in the books. When we were campaigning, some were saying that if we were not careful, it would come to about N8 trillion.<\/p>\n

For me, if we audit our consumption, definitely we don\u2019t consume up to N2 trillion at the old price. Secondly, if we get our refineries to work, it will be less. And Nigerians need to know the reason our refineries are not working.<\/p>\n

Can you explain further?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Let me give you a simple explanation. When you are trying to repair an existing refinery, and you have not finished repairing it and somebody gets an architect to draw a map of a refinery, you went to negotiate lands in many places, got lands, started construction, finished constructing, and now selling; you haven\u2019t finished repairing the one already in existence. What does that tell you? It tells you that the priority is to make sure that those things don\u2019t work.<\/p>\n

What do you think is the problem? Is it interest within the government that doesn\u2019t want the refineries to work or interest within the Nigeria National Petroleum Company Limited, NNPCL?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The NNPCL is part of the government, and nobody gets appointed without the government\u2019s approval. The idea is that they don\u2019t want to run the government. They don\u2019t want to run the economy. They are fighting to take control of the petroleum market. They see you as a customer, not as citizens. They don\u2019t want to be responsible for ensuring you have a good life of training your children, you can go to work with seven percent of your salary to pay for transportation.<\/p>\n

How did the government refuse to make the refineries work?<\/strong><\/p>\n

They need to create scarcity of work. These refineries were built years ago. The first one was part of our first development plan, the Port Harcourt Refinery, which was done during the Abubakar Tafawa Balewa era. Then, General Yakubu Gowon came and started building that of Warri. By that time, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo had taken over, and built Kaduna. The idea was that we would be building more because we are an energy-rich country, and we were not supposed to be worried about the small quantity being consumed in Nigeria. If we are productive, we should be consuming one million barrels a day. We were supposed to be exporting so that even the little part we are consuming locally will not be the essence of government. How many refineries are in Singapore? Go to the refinery market, with $2 billion to $3 billion you will build a good refinery. People call bogus figures here because the government is involved and they try to siphon the money. The refinery is an old technology distillation. The refinery in the Gulf of Beirut has been there since 1900. The one in Pennsylvania in was built in 1903, and they are still working. So, what is new about refinery? Talk to chemical engineers and ask them about the largest and most complex catalytic cracking unit. How much would it cost, even if they have to get it designed from the beginning? So, don\u2019t let us pretend that we don\u2019t know that we have been captured and our brothers and sisters in government who captured us want to squeeze us like oranges and squeeze the juice out of us, and probably, discard us when there is nothing more. They want to remove economic participation.<\/p>\n

Perhaps you are right; that\u2019s why they said recently that the rich may pay as much 25 percent on personal income tax\u2026<\/p>\n

I, Adewole Adebayo, government, come and tax me. I am ready to pay 50 percent of my income in taxes. I don\u2019t mind, after all, in Norway, it is higher than that. I am spending billion, literally, to power my productive enterprises. But, you cannot pauperise us, take all the taxes and still not be responsible for anything.<\/p>\n

Anybody who tells you that we should remove subsidy from an underdeveloped economy where productivity is low had F9 in economics. In China, with $10000, you can have a factory. All you need to do is to demonstrate to the city or the government there that you are producing this particular product. If they see the production plan, they will give you a factory on credit, and you start paying back. That is not available here in Nigeria. China is the largest producer of finished goods because of the subsidy. And you don\u2019t have to be in China. If it\u2019s the US, the first thing they welcome you with is a letter to come and borrow money. Sometimes, the Federal Reserve gives money to banks at negative interest to force them to lend money to people. During COVID 19, I was here in Nigeria. When I went to the US, I got stack of letters, awarding me money, wanting to give money to my law firm. They are subsidizing with credit.<\/p>\n

If you go to Europe, they are subsidizing with social services. You the employer of labour, when your worker is sick, you are not the one to pay because every worker, every citizen has life insurance and other social services, so it is cheaper to hire labour there.<\/p>\n

Come back to my beloved Nigeria. What is the incentive for productivity? Nothing, so you cannot compete. And the little that people are enjoying because we are petroleum rich country, we should now have low energy cost. That is what will drive you to say, let me go to Nigeria to take advantage of the low energy cost for my production.<\/p>\n

How about offering a tax holiday?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tax holiday is one of the ways through which they steal our money. Somebody will do 100 kilometres of poorly done cement road, very narrow and not standardised, and they will give the person billions of Naira for the same road that can be done by local government. Just collect your taxes.<\/p>\n

Are you saying that it is the mindset of the people emerging as leaders that determines the level of productivity in government and governance?<\/strong><\/p>\n

These people don\u2019t want to emerge as leaders. They want to take control of the tap of money. They don\u2019t want to lead you because if you are leading, you look back sometimes to see whether your people are following you. This is a case of doing to you what the colonial master was planning to do when Jaja of Opobo, Nana of Itshekiri, Ovonranmwen Nogbaisi of Benin Empire, and everybody was fighting that the colonialists that they cannot come to our place and exploit us. That is why you have the statue of Madam Tinubu in Lagos. Now, you are not being exploited by these people, you are now being exploited by your own people who are exporting your own money overseas because they want their names to appear as one of the richest persons in town. We need to stop that because we are growing a large population that needs to be productive, and that needs to express their talents. We need to form a government that gives support services. The essence of government is to back you up.<\/p>\n

I hope there won\u2019t be a tipping point to all these, what do you think?<\/strong><\/p>\n

I don\u2019t want us to reach a tipping point because the tipping point is a mirage. You would think people will never accept N500 per litre of fuel. They accepted over N1,000 and they are going towards N2,000 without anybody stopping them. We need to govern. That is the summary.<\/p>\n

Any government that cannot help you to find your missing cat or dog after a while won\u2019t be able to find a missing child. After a while, they won\u2019t be able to find a missing town and after a while, a community will go. Going to the Eagle\u2019s Square to hold the Bible or Quran and say a few words, salute the police and then disappear into the shadows, doesn\u2019t make you a government. The people must feel your presence if truly you are governing.<\/p>\n

Hardship: Tinubu govt squeezing Nigerians like oranges, tax incentives are being misused \u2013 Adewole Adebayo<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The 2023 presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Prince Adewole Adebayo, has accused the President Bola Tinubu-led government…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":55044,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1202,15,466,761],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55043","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hardship","category-news","category-tinubu","category-top-headlines"],"yoast_head":"\n