Human rights activist and constitutional lawyer, Femi Falana, has clarified that there was nothing contemptuous in the planned February 27 and 28 nationwide public protest by the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and Trade Union Congress (TUC).
Falana, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), insisted that Nigerian workers have freedom of assembly and freedom of expression as guaranteed by the country’s Constitution.
In a strongly worded letter to the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Falana asked the federal government to direct the Inspector General of Police (IGP) to provide maximum security to the workers and to also participate in the public protest.
In the letter responding to the contempt threat against the NLC and TUC leaders by the AGF, the counsel to the workers faulted the threat and dismissed it for having no basis.
Falana’s letter dated February 24 read in part: “It would be recalled that following the removal of fuel subsidy by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on May 29, 2023, the Federal Government commenced negotiations with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) as the subsidy removal policy had brought untold hardship to Nigerians.
“While the negotiations were in progress, the Federal Ministry of Justice rushed to the National Industrial Court to file Suit No NICN/ABJ/158/2023 between the Federal Government of Nigeria & Anor. v Nigeria Labour Congress & Anor in respect of the same issues.
“On June 5, 2023, the Honourable Justice Yemi Anuwe granted the application of the Federal Government for an ex parte order to restrain the NLC and TUC from embarking on a strike against the removal of fuel subsidy.
“Although both the NLC and TUC complied with the ex parte order, they promptly filed an application to set aside the same for lack of jurisdiction.
“They equally asked for a stay of execution of the order ex parte pending the determination of the motion. The application to set aside the ex parte order filed by the defendants and the motion for interlocutory injunction filed by the claimants have not been considered as parties resolved to settle the case out of court.
“Even though the parties signed a 16-point memorandum of understanding, the Federal Government did not implement all the terms of the agreement. Hence, on August 2, 2023, both NLC and TUC held a peaceful protest throughout the country.
“Instead of implementing the Agreement, the Federal Government initiated contempt proceedings against the NLC and TUC at the National Industrial Court.
“We challenged the competence of the contempt proceedings. However, the Federal Government turned round to withdraw the application for contempt.
“On November 10, 2023, the Federal Government filed another Suit, No NICN/ABJ/322/2023 between the Federal Government of Nigeria & Anor. at the National Industrial Court against the NLC and TUC, notwithstanding the pendency of Suit No. Suit No NICN/ABJ/158/2023.
“On that same day, the President of the National Industrial Court, the Honourable Justice Benedict Kanyip, granted an ex parte order to restrain the NLC and TUC from embarking on the planned strike.
“However, His Lordship directed that the case file be transferred to Justice Olufunke Yemi Anuwe who is handling a similar labour dispute between the same parties.
“Both NLC and TUC challenged the competence of the fresh suit on the ground that it constitutes a gross abuse of court process, inter alia. The application has not been heard and determined by the National Industrial Court.
“Having withdrawn the contempt proceedings filed against the NLC and TUC for embarking on a public protest on August 2, 2023, you ought not to have threatened the NLC with contempt of court over its plan to hold rallies from February 27-28, 2024, against the astronomical cost of living in the country.
“We submit, without any fear of contradiction, that the proposed public protest of the NLC is not contemptuous of the two ex parte orders of the National Industrial Court.
“In particular, the issue of contempt does not arise as the NLC has challenged the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Court to entertain the substantive case.
“It is further submitted that the National Industrial Court has not restrained the members of the NLC from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of expression to protest against the excruciating economic pains being experienced by the masses.
“In the case of Inspector-General of Police v All Nigeria Peoples Party (2008) 12 WRN 65, the Court of Appeal upheld the fundamental right of Nigerians to protest on matters of public interest without a police permit. In the leading judgment of the Court, Olufunmilayo Adekeye JCA (as she then was) held inter alia:
“The right to demonstrate and the right to protest on matters of public concern are rights which are in the public interest and that which individuals must possess, and which they should exercise without impediment as long as no wrongful act is done…
“If as speculated by law enforcement agents that breach of the peace would occur, our criminal code has made adequate provisions for sanctions against the breakdown of law and order so that the requirement of a permit as a conditionality to holding meetings and rallies can no longer be justified in a democratic society.”
“Since freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are part of the democratic rights of every citizen of Nigeria, the Court of Appeal further held that, “the legislature must guard these rights jealously as they are part of the foundation upon which the government itself rests.”
“Consequently, the National Assembly has ensured that the right of aggrieved citizens to protest peacefully for or against the government is protected.
“Thus, section 83(4) of the Police Establishment Act 2020, which “where a person or organization notifies the police of his or its intention to hold a public meeting, rally or procession on a public highway or such meetings in a place where the public has access to, the police officer responsible for the area where the meeting, rally or procession will take place shall mobilize personnel to provide security cover for the meeting, rally or the procession.”
“While we have advised the members of the NLC to conduct the rallies scheduled for February 27-28, 2024, in a peaceful manner, we urge you to use your good offices to direct the Inspector-General of Police to provide adequate security to the conveners and participants in the protest in line with the provisions of Section 83(4) of the Police Establishment Act.
“Finally, while awaiting your favorable reply to this letter, please accept, as usual, the assurance of our highest esteem.
The federal government had on Saturday threatened to invoke relevant laws to file contempt charges against the leadership of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) if the labor union proceeds with its February 27 nationwide protest.
The government claimed that the planned protest scheduled to hold on February 27 and 28 was a breach of agreement and therefore an affront to the existing order of the National Industrial Court.
The Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, issued the threat on Saturday as the federal government’s official objections to the protest.
In a letter he wrote to the lawyer to the NLC, Femi Falana SAN, the federal government asked the labor union to drop the planned protest to avoid running foul of the subsisting order of Court.
Contempt threat against NLC, TUC leaders over public protest uncalled for – Femi Falana replies FG
